Uppermost POS posts this, which does in fact alter Frater RO's pose on a department completely a bit. It moreover presents a moderately particular understanding of mystical Christianity and I participate that he chute in the sphere of the ensnare that abundant occultsists and pagans do of not extending Christianity the exceptionally power of notice to the mystical interpretation as they forte separate religion.
Frater RO annotations under in the exceptionally post, not wholly explaining what he expected, but moreover explaining the interpretation of Jesus as Logos, and as a result his universality even to colonize not Christian.
Close Patrick Dunn, posts this, which is high-class or less a foreword of the Gnostic/Neoplatonic secretion attention of introduction and the place of the Logos within it. He than states that "Any magician, of any formulate, of any religion, who does not understand this and would demean this unusual deity casts give cause for anxiety upon their understanding of magic."
After that all due acknowledgment, that is going high-class than a very small too far. Stage are two problems with this preoccupied.
The important is that tons of battle all aristocratic the world do magic minus any making nearby to this theistic secretion preoccupied. Buddhists for commission would not at all state the statements in Dunn's post and they do magic a moment ago fine, thank you.
The instantaneous hold is a very small high-class nuanced. You may matter the making of the Logos. You may moreover tranquil be tenaciously conflicting to the chart that the ancient history Jesus is in any way significant it. Cancel the Mandeans for commission (which we are in Iraq btw) who suppose that John the Baptist is the Logos and Jesus is a profligate Sorcerer that scarf his crash. The Logos is a incalculable label. Christ is a incalculable label. Jesus tranquil refers to a solitary body that may or may not own up existed at a solitary time and preached a solitary thing and than did or did not do the whole tolerate from the dead thing. So seeing that I participate it is dumb to do so, I participate it specifically reasonable that profit magicians may not jive with saying "Jesus is Member of the aristocracy".
Such as I am at it, I incentive put my Christian Cleric open neck on and consign that if you are a Christian and using the term Jesus, it can be a bad elapse to look at at him virtuously give orders the incalculable lens examine so that you wholly see this universally relevant "Logos". Christ is truthfully the Logos, but to really check up the beauty, power, and meaning of Jesus as the Logos you implore to get secure with Jesus as that solitary show. You necessity come to terms with what Kierkegaard called the Villainy of Specificity, otherwise you are not here out on a lot of the really good stuff in helpfulness of a very charming, indistinct, but universally sincere incalculable Christ.
Reference: theartofastralprojection.blogspot.com
